<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Beautiful Bill Archives - Shop in Seagoville</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com/tag/big-beautiful-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shopinseagoville.com/tag/big-beautiful-bill/</link>
	<description>Your Hometown Shopping Connection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Rural Hospitals Face a Dangerous 2027 as Medicaid Cuts Loom</title>
		<link>https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/10/05/rural-hospitals-face-a-dangerous-2027-as-medicaid-cuts-loom/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/10/05/rural-hospitals-face-a-dangerous-2027-as-medicaid-cuts-loom/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shop in Seagoville]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Beautiful Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Combine TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crandall TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Closures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seagoville TX]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shopinseagoville.com/?p=7621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025, is projected to cut federal Medicaid spending by $911 billion over 10 years.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/10/05/rural-hospitals-face-a-dangerous-2027-as-medicaid-cuts-loom/">Rural Hospitals Face a Dangerous 2027 as Medicaid Cuts Loom</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com">Shop in Seagoville</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><style>
.ssg-article{width:100%;max-width:100%;box-sizing:border-box;margin:0;padding:0;background:#ffffff;color:#1f2933;font-family:Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;font-size:19px;line-height:1.7}
.ssg-article *{box-sizing:border-box}
.ssg-article h1{font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:2.1rem;line-height:1.2;margin:0 0 12px;color:#111827}
.ssg-article .ssg-byline{font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:0.9rem;color:#52606d;margin:0 0 24px;padding-bottom:14px;border-bottom:3px solid #b91c1c}
.ssg-article h2{font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:1.45rem;line-height:1.3;margin:34px 0 10px;color:#7f1d1d}
.ssg-article p{margin:0 0 18px}
.ssg-article .ssg-tags{font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:0.9rem;color:#52606d;margin-top:30px;padding-top:14px;border-top:1px solid #d9e2ec}
@media (max-width:600px){.ssg-article{font-size:17px}.ssg-article h1{font-size:1.65rem}.ssg-article h2{font-size:1.25rem}}
</style></p>
<div class="ssg-article">
<h1>Can Rural Hospitals Survive Billions in Medicaid Cuts?</h1>
<p class="ssg-byline">By Staff Reports | October 5, 2026</p>
<p>Rural hospitals are entering 2027 under serious financial threat. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025, is projected to cut federal Medicaid spending by $911 billion over 10 years. Congress paired those cuts with a $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program.</p>
<p>KFF estimates that the fund covers only a fraction of the rural losses. Experts warn that some hospitals could close or cut services before any help arrives.</p>
<h2>The Fund Falls Far Short</h2>
<p>KFF estimates that federal Medicaid spending in rural areas will fall by $137 billion over 10 years. That is about $87 billion more than the rural fund provides. The fund offsets roughly 37% of the rural loss and about 5% of the national reduction.</p>
<p>A KFF report found that 36 states would lose $1 billion or more in rural Medicaid funding over 10 years even with the fund. Medicaid covers 1 in 4 adults in rural areas according to KFF. Hospitals also lose money on Medicaid patients before any cuts take effect.</p>
<p>The American Hospital Association reported that hospitals received nearly $28 billion less from Medicaid in 2023 than treating Medicaid patients cost. The National Rural Health Association says rural hospitals already struggle to break even. Those gaps leave little room to absorb new losses.</p>
<p>The rural fund is also temporary. KFF estimates that 64% of the Medicaid reductions occur after fiscal year 2030. By then the rural fund will have ended.</p>
<h2>Experts Say the Fund Cannot Rescue Hospitals</h2>
<p>The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities notes that CMS has been clear the program is not designed to backfill deep Medicaid cuts. It is also not designed to shore up the providers who bear the burden of those cuts.</p>
<p>Katherine Hempstead of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation said the fund does not address immediate needs such as basic financial stability. She said facilities may struggle to stay open before improvements can begin.</p>
<p>Carrie Cochran-McClain of the National Rural Health Association compared the fund to a retirement account. She said hospitals still need a paycheck from Medicaid payments to keep operating. Analysts also note that states may use only a small share of the money to stabilize hospitals directly.</p>
<h2>How the $50 Billion Is Distributed</h2>
<p>Congress set aside $10 billion per year from 2026 through 2030. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced awards to all 50 states on Dec. 29, 2025. Hospitals do not compete for these dollars at the federal level.</p>
<p>States receive the money and then decide how to spend it. Half of the funding is divided equally among the states. KFF found that only 5% of the total is tied to rural population.</p>
<h2>Texas Gets the Largest Award but Hospitals Are Thin on Cash</h2>
<p>Texas received about $281 million for the first year of the program. That was the largest award of any state. Texas leaders call their plan Rural Texas Strong.</p>
<p>The Texas Hospital Association says the state has more than 150 rural hospitals. About 3.7 million residents live in a rural county. The state plan found that 48 rural facilities had less than 10 days of cash on hand in 2024.</p>
<p>Texas Medicine Today reports that the revised plan sends $280 million directly to rural hospital districts over five years. It supports 80 districts with publicly owned hospitals. Public and private rural hospitals become eligible in the second year.</p>
<p>Texas has not expanded Medicaid. Chartis found that 52.2% of rural hospitals in states that did not expand were operating in the red. That compares with 34.9% in states that did expand.</p>
<h2>Early Warning Signs</h2>
<p>Chartis reported in February that 41.2% of rural hospitals were operating in the red. It identified 417 as vulnerable to closure and counted 206 that have closed or stopped inpatient care since 2010. Tennessee had the highest share of vulnerable hospitals at 61%.</p>
<p>KFF Health News reported in April that a rural Nebraska dialysis unit closed despite the state&#8217;s $219 million rural health award. Rural hospital leaders told the Daily Yonder in late September that they have not seen relief yet. Some hospitals are cutting obstetrics and other services.</p>
<p>National Rural Health Association CEO Alan Morgan has said that Medicaid cuts will result in rural hospital closures. Researchers have also warned that the financial erosion could trigger closures and service cuts. The risk is highest in communities where many patients rely on Medicaid.</p>
<h2>What Changes in 2027</h2>
<p>Medicaid work requirements must begin no later than Jan. 1, 2027 in states that expanded Medicaid. Adults ages 19 to 64 must document 80 hours each month of qualifying activity. Qualifying activities include employment and education and approved work programs.</p>
<p>The federal rule lists nine exempt groups. About 20 million adults are covered by the new rule. Those adults will also renew their coverage every six months.</p>
<p>The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 10 million more people will be uninsured by 2034. KFF Health News reports that many will turn to crowded emergency rooms for care they cannot pay for. Hospitals then face more uncompensated care.</p>
<p>The largest hospital financing changes come later. Limits on state provider taxes begin phasing down on Oct. 1, 2027. Some state directed payments are reduced starting Jan. 1, 2028.</p>
<h2>Will Patients Drive Farther?</h2>
<p>Closures push patients farther from help. A University of Kentucky study found average ambulance transport time rose from 14.2 minutes to 25.1 minutes after a rural hospital closed. That is about 77% more time in the ambulance.</p>
<p>Research on deaths is not unanimous. Some studies found that closures raised deaths from heart attacks and strokes. Others found no clear effect on mortality.</p>
<p>Many hospitals cut services long before they close. Chartis found that 293 rural hospitals stopped offering obstetrics between 2011 and 2023. Women who need maternity care then must travel to another facility.</p>
<h2>Survival Will Be Difficult</h2>
<p>Survival options are limited and often mean less care. Texas plans grants for equipment and cybersecurity upgrades. Chartis cautions that state plans are uneven and may not fix immediate operating shortfalls.</p>
<p>Some hospitals may convert to the Rural Emergency Hospital model. That model ends inpatient care while keeping emergency services. It can keep a facility open but changes what the community can receive locally.</p>
<p>State lawmakers in some states are considering loans and other aid for distressed hospitals. Texas aims to reduce the number of rural hospitals with less than 10 days of cash. Those efforts will test whether state money can reach the hospitals that need it most.</p>
<h2>What Rural Voters Will Decide</h2>
<p>Whether longer drives become a political issue will depend on local events. Voters may judge the law by what happens at their own hospital. The midterm elections on Nov. 3 give voters a chance to weigh in.</p>
<p>Supporters see the law differently. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this year that there are no cuts to Medicaid. Federal Medicaid spending is still projected to grow but more slowly than it would have without the law.</p>
<h2>The Outlook</h2>
<p>In 2027 the clearest changes will be new Medicaid enrollment rules and early spending of the rural fund. The larger financing cuts arrive in 2028 and later. The fund ends after 2030 while most of the Medicaid reductions are still ahead.</p>
<p>Hospitals that already operate at a loss have the least room to absorb those cuts. How many stay open will depend on how states spend the money and how quickly coverage losses reach hospital finances.</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/10/05/rural-hospitals-face-a-dangerous-2027-as-medicaid-cuts-loom/">Rural Hospitals Face a Dangerous 2027 as Medicaid Cuts Loom</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com">Shop in Seagoville</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/10/05/rural-hospitals-face-a-dangerous-2027-as-medicaid-cuts-loom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Beautiful Bill: $460 Billion Administration</title>
		<link>https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/09/08/the-big-beautiful-bill-460-billion-administration/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/09/08/the-big-beautiful-bill-460-billion-administration/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shop in Seagoville]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 02:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Beautiful Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billionaire Tax Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billionaires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Combine TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crandall TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elon Musk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seagoville TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Billionaire Swamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gildered Age]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shopinseagoville.com/?p=7498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s start with the numbers, because in this story, the numbers tell the truth that words obscure. President Donald Trump: Entered his second term with a net worth of $5.2 billion, according to Forbes. That alone made him the wealthiest president in American history—by a factor of ten. But Trump wasn’t content to be the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/09/08/the-big-beautiful-bill-460-billion-administration/">The Big Beautiful Bill: $460 Billion Administration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com">Shop in Seagoville</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Let’s start with the numbers, because in this story, the numbers tell the truth that words obscure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">President Donald Trump: Entered his second term with a net worth of $5.2 billion, according to Forbes. That alone made him the wealthiest president in American history—by a factor of ten. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But Trump wasn’t content to be the only billionaire in the room. He surrounded himself with people who <a href="https://books.by/merv-moore/the-big-beautiful-bill-how-t"><strong>swim in the same financial waters</strong></a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The list reads like a Forbes 400 convention program:</span></p>
<p><b>Elon Musk: The world’s richest person, worth an estimated $431 billion. </b></p>
<p><b>Howard Lutnick: Commerce Secretary, net worth $3 billion</b></p>
<p><b>Linda McMahon: Education Secretary, net worth $3 billion.</b></p>
<p><b>Stephen Feinberg: Deputy Defense Secretary, net worth $5 billion.</b></p>
<p><b>Steve Witkoff: Ambassador‑at‑Large, net worth $2 billion.</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span></p>
<p><b>Kelly Loeffler: Small Business Administration Administrator, net worth $1 billion.</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span></p>
<p><b>Warren Stephens: Ambassador to the United Kingdom, net worth undisclosed but billionaire status confirmed.</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span></p>
<p><b>Tilman Fertitta: Ambassador to Italy, net worth undisclosed but billionaire status confirmed.</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Add it all up, and the combined wealth of the “Trump Nine” approaches 460 billion. To put that in perspective: If these nine people pooled their resources, they’d have enough money to buy Denmark outright (GDP 450 million).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Neither Greenland nor Denmark is for sale, of course, because countries aren’t bought and sold. But it’s characteristic of billionaires to presume that everything is for sale—including, now, the government of the United States.</span></p>
<p><b>And here’s the kicker:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> This doesn’t even include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, often described in news accounts as a billionaire, though his declared net worth is only about half a billion. In any other administration, a $500 million Treasury secretary would be the headline. Here, he’s barely a footnote.</span></p>
<h3><b>The Price of Admission</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">How do you get one of these jobs? It helps to be a billionaire. It helps more to be a donor.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://books.by/merv-moore/the-big-beautiful-bill-how-t"><strong>Let’s follow the money</strong></a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In the 2024 election cycle, Elon Musk donated or directed approximately 291 million to support Trump and other Republicans. He was rewarded with billions in new federal contracts and subsidies.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Howard Lutnick kicked in 14 millions. Linda McMahon added $12 million. Combined, the Trump Nine donated roughly one‑third of a billion dollars to secure Trump’s return to the White House.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But the giving didn’t stop on Election Day.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trump’s 2025 inaugural committee raised a staggering $239 million—four times what President Biden raised in 2021. The biggest billionaire donors, not coincidentally, scored the highest‑ranking billionaire appointments. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Musk, Lutnick, and McMahon—the top three donors—became the top three billionaire officials.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is not how democracy is supposed to work. In a functioning democracy, you earn a Cabinet position through expertise, experience, and a demonstrated commitment to public service. In Trump’s Washington, you buy it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We’re in uncharted waters,” Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center for Justice, told The New York Times in January 2025. “It’s tempting to liken this to the Gilded Age.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"> But John D. Rockefeller didn’t actually run McKinley’s campaign or move into the White House.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Waldman might have added that the Gilded Age never gave us a president who issued his own currency (as Trump has done no fewer than four times) or owned a majority stake in the private company (Truth Social) that informs the nation of his policies.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"> At the end of Trump’s first term, the nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) tallied nearly 4,000 financial conflicts of interest. Those conflicts haven’t diminished in his second term—they’ve multiplied.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There are Trump Bibles (Trump doesn’t attend church). Trump wine tumblers (Trump doesn’t drink). Trump key chains, hoodies, wrapping paper, umbrellas, golf balls, beach towels, sneakers, and pajamas. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Most of these are available at </span><a href="https://www.trumpstore.com/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">www.trumpstore.com</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, and the proceeds go not to some campaign fund but to the Trump Organization—a privately held corporation owned by the president and run by his two oldest sons.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Everything’s for sale. Including, it seems, the government.</span></p>
<h3><b>From the Gilded Age to the Platinum Age</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">To understand how we got here, we need to understand how we got anywhere—because the concentration of wealth we’re witnessing today isn’t normal. It isn’t inevitable. It’s the result of policy choices made over five decades.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In his farewell address, President Joe Biden warned that “an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power, and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead.” </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Biden was talking about Trump, and he was right. But the problem predates Trump—and will outlast him if we don’t understand its roots.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Let’s start with some perspective on what a billion dollars actually means.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Most of us can conceptualize a million dollars. The median home price in America is about 400,000; in California, it’s approaching.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But billionaires? That’s different.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Consider the difference between one million and one billion. It’s not just the next large number—it’s the next large number by a factor of one thousand. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">If you wanted to count to one million out loud, at one number per second with no breaks, you’d be done in about 11.5 days. A man in Birmingham, Alabama, actually did this in 2007, counting into a webcam every day, and reached one million in 89 days.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But counting to one billion? That would take 31 years and 8 months with no breaks—and if you worked at the same pace as the Birmingham counter, it would take more than 244 years. That’s twice the longest human lifespan ever recorded.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">To own $1 billion is to possess more dollars than you’ll ever count. It’s to possess more dollars than you could reasonably spend in ten lifetimes. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">And yet, in Trump’s America, we’ve put a dozen people with that kind of wealth in charge of writing the rules for everyone else.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The consequences are predictable—and predicted.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">After Trump’s 2017 tax cut, the combined wealth of America’s billionaires doubled to $6 trillion, according to a July 2024 report by Americans for Tax Fairness. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Going back to the start of the twenty‑first century, American billionaire wealth has increased ninefold. There aren’t enough billionaires in America to fill Carnegie Hall, but they now own 3.8% of the nation’s total wealth.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">During that same quarter‑century, the bottom half of the income distribution—about 66 million families—increased their collective wealth not ninefold but twofold, thanks largely to COVID stimulus checks. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Those 66 million families own not 3.8% of America’s wealth, but just 2.5%.</span></p>
<p><b>The Foxes Guarding the Henhouse</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">So what happens when you put billionaires in charge of the government? You get policies that benefit billionaires.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Consider the <a href="https://books.by/merv-moore/the-big-beautiful-bill-how-t"><strong>“Big Beautiful Bill”</strong></a> itself. Its primary purpose was to make the 2017 tax cuts permanent—locking in trillions of dollars in giveaways for the wealthy and corporations. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The estate tax exemption was raised to 15 million per person (30 millions for couples),  ensuring that billionaire dynasties can pass their fortunes to heirs without paying a dime in taxes. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The qualified business income deduction—a massive loophole that lets wealthy business owners treat their income as “business income” to avoid higher tax rates—was made permanent and expanded.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">These provisions didn’t write themselves. They were written by people who benefit from them—or whose donors benefit from them.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is what happens when billionaires run the government. They don’t suddenly develop working‑class sympathies. They don’t forget how they made their money. They don’t start prioritizing the needs of rural hospitals over the interests of corporate donors.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They do what they’ve always done: look out for themselves and people like them.</span></p>
<h3><b>The Billionaire Tax Rate: A Preview</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Which brings us to a fundamental question: If billionaires are running the government, why would they ever raise taxes on themselves?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They wouldn’t. And they haven’t.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">According to a recent study from University of California, Berkeley economists, the individuals on the Forbes 400 list—including Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and their peers—paid an average effective tax rate of just 24% between 2018 and 2020. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">That’s six percentage points lower than the 30% rate paid by other taxpayers.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">How is this possible? The wealthy structure their income differently.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Your paycheck is taxed as “ordinary income” at rates up to 37%, plus another 7.65% for Social Security and Medicare. But the wealthy don’t live on paychecks. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They live on investments—capital gains from selling stocks, bonds, real estate, and other assets. And capital gains are taxed at a maximum rate of just 23.8%.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Even better (for them), they don’t have to pay taxes on wealth they haven’t “realized” by selling. If Elon Musk’s Tesla stock goes up by $10 billion in a year, he owes zero taxes on that gain—until he sells. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">He can borrow against that stock to fund his lifestyle, and the loans aren’t taxable income.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is the “buy, borrow, die” strategy that allows billionaires to avoid taxes indefinitely. They buy assets that appreciate. They borrow against those assets to fund their spending. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">And when they die, their heirs inherit the assets with a “step‑up in basis,” meaning the capital gains taxes that were never paid are wiped out entirely.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://books.by/merv-moore/the-big-beautiful-bill-how-t"><strong>The “Big Beautiful Bill” didn’t close this loophole.</strong></a> It expanded it—by making the estate tax exemption permanent and raising it to $15 million per person.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In 2022, the top 0.001% of earners—just 1,538 households—each made at least $85.5 million and paid an average federal tax rate of only 23.5%. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">That’s roughly the same effective rate paid by an iron and steel worker or a high school special education teacher in Pennsylvania.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Let that sink in. The people who make $85 million a year pay the same tax rate as a special education teacher. And under the “Big Beautiful Bill,” that arrangement is now permanent.</span></p>
<h3><b>The Swamp They Promised to Drain</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Remember the promise? “Drain the swamp.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It was the central metaphor of Trump’s 2016 campaign—a pledge to rid Washington of the lobbyists, insiders, and special interests who profit at the expense of ordinary Americans.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The reality, nine years later, is a swamp that has been dredged, expanded, and repopulated with creatures far more exotic than anything that existed before.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trump’s first‑term Cabinet had only one confirmed billionaire—Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. But there were enough multi‑millionaires to boost the Cabinet’s combined wealth to $6.2 billion—a record at that time.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Today’s Cabinet, excluding Elon Musk, is worth $14 billion—more than twice the combined net worth of Trump’s first‑term Cabinet. With Musk included, the number approaches half a trillion dollars.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is not draining the swamp. This is stocking the swamp with alligators and charging admission.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The cynicism of it all is breathtaking. Trump campaigned as a populist, wearing aprons and riding garbage trucks, promising to fight for the forgotten man and woman. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">He posed with coal miners, hung his face from the Department of Labor building, and talked endlessly about bringing back manufacturing jobs.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But when it came time to govern, <a href="https://books.by/merv-moore/the-big-beautiful-bill-how-t"><strong>he surrounded himself with people whose entire existence</strong></a> depends on the systems that keep working people down. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">People who made their fortunes by minimizing labor costs, maximizing government contracts, and structuring their affairs to avoid taxes.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The “Big Beautiful Bill” is the proof. It delivers permanent tax cuts for billionaires and temporary crumbs for everyone else. It cuts Medicaid by hundreds of billions while expanding estate tax exemptions. It makes the wealthy wealthier and calls it a win for the working class.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">And the billionaires who wrote it, who funded it, who now occupy the highest offices in the land—they’re not even pretending to apologize.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">They’re building a ballroom.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But that’s a story for another chapter.</span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/09/08/the-big-beautiful-bill-460-billion-administration/">The Big Beautiful Bill: $460 Billion Administration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shopinseagoville.com">Shop in Seagoville</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shopinseagoville.com/2026/09/08/the-big-beautiful-bill-460-billion-administration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
